Status
Fuck being a long time since last update in 2009. Back to work : slowly, slowly very slowly.

To reward your patience here's the link for the Belgrade show I recorded myself http://www.megaupload.com/?d=9GZK2CMW
and the one from Buenos Aires IM_2009_03_28_Buenos_Aires.rar.

About the files
Video bootlegs are indicated otherwise it's audio.
Audio files are mainly mp3, few are wma and no lossless format (flac, shn, ape, aac or other more exotic) here. Why ?
- First bootlegs are not official material and most of them have not what I call a real good sound.This is not SACD or coming from a 48 tracks ! Do you know the real price of a good microphone or a Nagra (if you don't know what to do with yours think at me) ? Tapers are sound engineers ? As I have done some I know how difficult is it to record. Don't forget post-production, software for that purpose are not piece of cake.
- To proove lossless files aren't mp3 converted files you usually find a picture of an analysis by software. What I don't understand is that : if mp3 is so bad why people do not use their own ears to see the difference ? Like black and white.
- As it is explained by many people mp3 is a lossy codec : that means there's compression with loss of data. This is a fact. But when the source is not good, I should say real bad, you have already many losses !!! What does it change to convert to mp3 ? Tell me !!! Give me a percent. Quick, quick I am still waiting.
- It's more easy to share and less expensive to store on cd unless you send me money to buy hundreds of cd. Lossless files are too big for being hosted on webhosters and other channels for sharing them are more indicated.
- You find more bootlegs in mp3 than in lossless codec.
- Everybody hasn't got a high speed connection.
- Some lossless networks, forums and hubs are closed to many people.
- Do you know that burned cd are worst in quality than pressed cd made by a factory ? And what about the quality of the media. Search the price for Taiyo Yuden's cd and also dvd. Don't forget the burner.
- Outside computer world, mobile music devices (you have to change the earphones because it is shit) read mp3, sometimes wma and few other formats, sometimes don't read wav but never lossless codec. And I don't speak about a real audio HIFI system to listen the music in good or perfect conditions and what it cost (thousands of euros). Neither the cost of acoustic work to do in your room. Neither the upbringing of your ears.
To conclude when you want real and the best quality you have to control all steps of the process otherwise it's only bullshit. So it doesn't matter to me if I loose some details by compression because the source is bad. For all these reasons I choose mp3 for bootlegs. I have nothing against lossless, I use it for other stuff. Each one have the freedom and the right to choose his favorite codec, no ?

Archives (zip or rar) are not fuckin' password protected. Files are available as long as defined in webhoster's rules. I didn't checked what version was for each link (I'm not paid for that and have no time for). It means that you can have for various links the same version or not and w/o covers, info text, etc... Use Google for the use of files and find howto.